Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Unexpectedly Inspired



I have had a terrible week.  I’ve been upset in all sorts of ways this week.  And for some reason the only thing that has cheered me up this week is music, specific “pop” country music, even more specifically this song:
Why am I telling you this? I have two reasons:
  1. My english teacher today reminded us we have to have 20 blog posts and I am behind. (This is mainly because I don’t know what to write about. I just don’t feel that inspired and when I do I get create the shit found on this blog. Though, you will mostly find different essays or reviews I’ve written about books I’ve read, more of which will be coming soon.)   
  2. Today I am feeling inspired. My english teacher told us today that he had found a song on one of his student’s blogs that impacted him.  He told us we could write about songs we like and music.
Honey, I can do that.  I can rant and rave about music and books all day, I just had not thought to rant about music.  So, the song I chose today, linked up above, is Shut Up and Fish by Maddie & Tae.  It's not inspiring and doesn’t really portray any important message, it just makes me happy.  It makes makes me think about summer and honestly, I am so ready for summer.  I’ve never been a summer person but the idea of the summer is appealing to me right now.  Sun and being outside instead of being trapped in a desk in a school just sounds amazing.  It's giving me something to look forward too and motivates me.
I hope you have a better week than I did,
Megan

Monday, March 13, 2017

City of Heavenly Fire by Cassandra Clare

I do not remember writing this book report but I found it the other day and it made me smile.  I am a very big fan of Cassandra Clare's books (I'm planning to write a blog about that later this week).  I read City of Heavenly Fire in ninth grade, which is when this was probably written. 

Here is the prompt: 
Describe 10 things that happened in the book and then write about what you learned about life/our world from the book. (Fiction: Friendship, hate, persistence, love, overcoming difficulties, difficulties… Non-Fiction: facts, how to…)

Here is what I wrote:
1.   What was happening in the book?
Alec and Magnus broke up in the previous book.  Alec is at the beach with his friends but all he does is text Magnus.  Jace tells Alec he needs to stop thinking about Magnus and enjoy himself.  He takes and breaks Alec’s phone.  Isabell suggests that since the rest of the group had already tried talking to Magnus that Jace should try.  Jace said he would try but Alec needed to spend some time just hanging out not thinking about Magnus.  
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned the true friends will do what is needed for you to be happy, even if it's not what they/you want. 
   
2.  What was happening in the book?
Sebastian (the antagonist) has threaten the clave and all shadowhunters living in the mundie world.  The Lightwoods, Garraways, and Clary have to evacuate to Idris.  Magnus, Alec’s new ex-boyfriend, comes to say goodbye and tell him to stay safe.  Clary makes Simon, her ex-boyfriend and best friend, promise to stay safe and out of the way.  She tells him that she loves him.  
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned that when you love someone, no matter how bad your relationship situation, you want them to be safe and you want the best for them.
3.   What was happening in the book?
The Blackthorn children are the only witnesses to their father’s and brother’s murder/kidnapping.  The Clave uses the mortal sword to interrogate Julian, the oldest male Blackthorn.  His best friend Emma sees that the sword is hurting him and screams for the interrogation to be called off.  She is told to stand down and Julian reassures her that everything is okay.  She runs off very upset.  Later Clary goes to talk to her and tells her she is brave.  
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
That sometimes the bravest thing you can do is to let someone do something by themselves. 
4.  What was happening in the book?
Raphael joins Sebastian’s, the bad guy, side and is told to kill Magnus.  He loves Magnus as a friend and owes him his life.  Raphael sacrifices himself to save Magnus.
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned that you should always do the right thing no matter how it hurts you.  I learned that people will do anything for someone they love.
5.  What was happening in the book?
Jace sees a sword at the top of a statue.  He climbs the statue against everyone's advice he climbs the statue and takes it.  They are attacked by demons and Isabelle is bitten.  She almost dies but Simon saves her.
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned you should always take other’s safety into account.
6.   What was happening in the book?
Simon hasn’t had any blood (he is a vampire) in four days and is starving.  He can’t drink Jace’s blood and Jace won’t let him drink Clary’s so Alec volunteers his own.  Alec and Simon go of down into a cave for some privacy.  They talk about a few different things like Alec’s ex-boyfriend, Simon’s relationship with Alec’s sister, and Alec’s view of vampires.  The conversation ends with Alec saying he approves of Isabelle and Simon relationship.  
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
Most people would do anything for someone they love.
7.  What was happening in the book?
Julian Blackthorn’s possessed father is killing innocent people..  He goes after Julian’s little brother Ty and Julian kills his father to protect his brother.  Ty screams at Julian that he hates him for killing their father but Ty would be dead if he hadn’t.   
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
Doing the right thing not always easy.
8.  What was happening in the book?
Clary kills her brother with heavenly fire.  The little good that is in him remains just long enough for him to apologize and save everyone from his doomsday trap.  He dies in his mother’s arms.  
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned that their is good in everyone.  I also learned that death brings out a person’s true personality.
9.  What was happening in the book?
Clary, Jace, Alec,. Magnus, Isabelle, and Simon were trapped in Hell and their only way out was either Magnus or Simon giving up their immortality and their memories.  Magnus was willing to but Simon wouldn’t let him.  Simon gave up his immortality to save his friends and lost them in the process.
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned that true friends will put their safety and happiness in front of their own.  I also learned that true selflessness takes true courage.  
10. What was happening in the book?
Robert Lightwood’s only living biological son has told him that unless he quits being negative with him and the rest of their family that Alec will cut off all ties with with him.  Robert sees Alec at his old friends’, Luke and Jocelyn, wedding.  He talks to Alec about how he is sorry for everything that he has done and that he really is trying to make amends.  Alec decides that he will continue talking to his father but he is on a short leash.
What did you learn about life from what was happening in the book?
I learned that forgiveness is a process.  It takes a lot of time and a lot of work but it is worth when you get to the end. 

Don’t Burn or Ban Books

For an English class I was required to write this email.  I discuss censorship of literature. 
Dear intended recipient,
My name is Megan Frost.  I am a sophomore student at Taylorsville High School in Taylorsville, Utah.  In my English class fellow students and I were required to read Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451.  It is a dystopian novel about a man named Guy Montag.  He is employed as a fireman.  Firemen are charged with the job of burning books, hence the title Fahrenheit 451, the temperature at which books burn. The story begins when Montag, he is referred to by his last name in the text, meets a peculiar neighbor named Clarisse McClellan, She makes him think deeper about his job and the society's way of living. Two big themes in this book are censorship and the importance of gaining perspective from books which will be the focal point of my email to you.
Although in our current times we do not have firemen that burn books we do have book censorship.  Book censorship is the banning of books that are considered objectionable.  One famous book series banned from certain libraries is the Harry Potter series. Factmonster.com explains, “The Harry Potter books are a good example of this: some think they are wonderfully imaginative books that have done much to encourage kids to read; others, who think the Potter books should be banned, think they are a bad and corrupting influence on kids.” One arguement against banning Harry Potter is explored by scientificamerican.com referencing a study published in Science Magizine. Scientificamerican.com states the following, “A study published last year in Science found that reading literary fiction, as opposed to popular fiction or nonfiction, results in keener social perception and increased empathy — empathy being defined more or less as the ability to alternate between different perspectives on a particular person or situation. Literature with complex, developed themes and characters appears to let readers occupy or adopt perspectives they might otherwise not consider; and it seems that Rowling might get at the beautiful, sobering mess of life in a way that could have a meaningful impact on our children’s collective character.”
To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is another book that has been on and off banned book lists. According to the American Library Association it has been on banned on thirteen different occasions. It was written in the beginning of the civil rights movement, a movement to grant African Americans equal rights. According to resources.mhs.vic.edu.au “The novel climbed to the top of the New York Times Best Seller's list as it began to make its remarkable impact on a divided nation.” According to socialistworker.org “It's as an anti-racist novel of the civil rights movement, with its deep commitment to social justice and full equality--this is what earned it such a wide appeal.” It is said it had a long lasting effect on society and has historically relevant information.  The book itself was based off of things the author witnessed in her childhood.    
Another argument against censorship displayed by factmonster.com is that it infringes on first amendment rights.  It states, “The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees our right to freedom of speech, which includes the right to read and write books that might be considered by some to be too violent, hateful, or offensive. Because this freedom is one of our fundamental rights as Americans, some people feel that any form of censorship is wrong.”
In Fahrenheit 451 censorship is a clear theme. One character, Captain Beatty, is in favor of censorship, saying, “The bigger your market, Montag, the less you handle controversy, remember that!... Authors, full of evil thoughts, lock up your typewriters. They did.” But the society in the text is viewed by the main character in the book, Montag, and his friend, Faber, as being stuck in its place with no room for growth. Ray Bradbury states in his book that “There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them.”   
Thank you for your time,
Megan Frost  

The Dangers of Isolation: Lessons learned from Lord of the Flies and Of Mice and Men

In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies and John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men it is clearly presented that isolation is both figuratively and literally a death sentence.  Isolation is dangerous because it provides no outside protection, it leads to bad decisions, and can lead to depression.
    Isolation makes a person vulnerable.  In John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men the two main characters, George Milton and Lennie Small, are two migrant workers during the Great Depression.  Lennie has a mental disorder that often affects his ability to get work.  George says the following about being isolated, “You can’t keep a job and you lose me ever’ job I get. Jus’ keep me shovin’ all over the country all the time” (Steinbeck 11). They lose their jobs and are forced to move around a lot restricting their budget and making them vulnerable.  They are isolated with no permanent neighborhood or family outside of themselves. Isolation or living on the outskirts of society leaves them without a safety net.  There is no one to look after or protect them besides each other.
Isolation provides no protection. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies the cast of characters, six to twelve year old boys, are the survivors of a plane crash and are stranded on an island. Two of the main characters realize that none of the adults survived the plane crash and that the surviving boys were scattered all over the island.  These two lead characters call a meeting to establish some order or sense of community.  At this meeting a little boy with a mulberry-colored mark on his face steps forward with the help of an older boy to say he has seen a “beastie” on the island.  The main protagonist and character leading the meeting, Ralph ridicules him for saying the beastie came at night by declaring, “‘Then he couldn’t see it!’” (Golding 36). After this comment the little boy is forgotten as the story progresses until a later meeting one of the older boys says “‘That little ‘un that had a mark on his face-where is-he now? I tell you I don’t see him’” (46). The little boy was isolated, forgotten because of his seemingly unrealistic observations.  He is placed in a very dangerous and vulnerable situation with no one to protect him. Beastie or no beastie it is not safe to be isolated.  When he needed comfort and reassurance, he was ridiculed and disbelieved.     
Isolation leads to bad decisions.  In Lord of the Flies the boys on the island elect Ralph as their chief.  One of the boys named Jack also wanted to be chief but settled for being in charge of the hunters. As the situation on the island escalates Jack tries for a re-vote for chief. “‘Hands up,’ said Jack strongly, ‘whoever wants Ralph not to be chief?’
The silence continued, breathless and heavy and full of shame. Slowly the red drained from Jack’s cheeks, then came back with a painful rush. He licked his lips and turned his head at an angle so that his gaze avoided the embarrassment of linking with another’s eye” (127).
Jack runs off to the forest and decides to form his own tribe.  He convinces the boys to participate in a hunting dance in which the boys dance around in a circle chanting “‘Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!’” (152) One of the boys named Simon ends up in the middle of the circle and was killed by all the other boys. The violence only escalates from there.  “‘[Jack]’s going to beat Wilfred.’  
‘What for?’
Robert shook his head doubtfully.
‘I don’t know’” (159).
Jack extended himself emotionally when he publicly asked for approval and validation as the chief and when he wasn’t chosen he turned his anger and resentment into hatred.  Since he was emotionally compromised he made the decision to try and divide the island.  That decision  and his later actions led to a lot of suffering on the island.  The division created competition and animosity. His selfishness and feeling of betrayal fueled poor decisions.  Instead of thinking about the needs of everyone stranded on the island, Jack thought only about his needs, and what he was good at.  He enjoyed the company of his fellow hunters and decided to elevate them above Ralph’s group and create his own tribe.  To maintain his status with the hunters he had to foster the opposition and create his own misguided sense of community. He wasn't isolated in a physical sense but he was emotionally withdraw with no care for logic.     
Ralph, the main protagonist from Lord of the Flies, begins to feel isolated once he loses most of his followers to Jack´s new tribe.  He wishes for the boys to remain in a group even taking part in their hunting dance.  In the book it says “Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society” (152).  Ralph knows what they are doing is demented but has the fear of being isolated.  In their wild frenzy the boys end up murdering a fellow stranded child named Simon.  His fear of isolation drove him to act in a way he originally wouldn’t have.         
Isolation leads to depression.  In Of Mice and Men, Lennie accidentally kills his boss’s son’s wife.  George kills his best friend Lennie to save him from the wrath of the husband of the woman he killed. George reacts by looking “steadily at his right hand that had held the gun” “But sat stiffly on the bank and looked at his right hand that had thrown the gun away” (Steinbeck 107). George has known Lennie in the story longer than the story has been told. They began the story isolated together.  George emotionally isolated himself by destroying his closest relationship.  Whether he understood the consequences or not, he further isolated himself.  From George’s reaction it is clear he is very distressed and will live with the psychological effects of killing his best friend for the rest of his life.  He will feel the impact of his emotional isolation for the rest of his life.   
Isolation has negative effects on your emotional well-being.  In Lord of the Flies Ralph is forced to hide from Jack’s angry tribe in the forest. “He knelt among the shadows and felt his isolation bitterly” (Golding 185).  His best friend Piggy is dead as well as his friend Simon.  The twins Sam and Eric joined Jack’s tribe and “were guarding the Castle Rock against him” (186). He feels so alone he even resorts to trying to visit Samneric saying “It’s only me. Ralph” (187). Ralph is clearly broken from his isolation on the island.  He has no one left.  He resorts to going to a place he is not welcome in search of human interaction.  He proves that isolation inhibits your logical mind and emotionally damages a person.
Some may argue, isolation is safer than inclusion because it eliminates peer pressures, it limits danger from other people, and it promotes clearer thinking. However, in comparison, the original claim is better supported.   
Isolation is dangerous because it provides no outside protection, it leads to bad decisions, and leads to depression. Humans are social creatures and require interaction. Isolated, we have no one to share our thoughts, ideas, and fears with.  Left alone with these thoughts without a contradiction, we can allow poor decisions and ideas to breed and sprout without opposition to test or strengthen the reason behind the thoughts.  Safety or strength of conviction is best created through trial and error, contrasting different thoughts and opinions.  Seeing their consequences and then evaluating and taking the good and reducing or eliminating the bad.
        



Works Cited
Golding, William. Lord of the Flies. New York: Penguin Group, 1954.
Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York: Penguin Books, 1993. 

Codependency in A Separate Peace by John Knowles

In tenth grade I had the amazing opportunity to read A Separate Peace. I loved it, I even went after school to rant to my English teacher about my fangirlly feelings. I wrote the following essay about the one of the themes in the beautiful piece of art: 

A Seperate Peace Essay: 

A Separate Peace by John Knowles is a novel taking place during World War II. Told from the point of view of Gene, the main character, it tells the tale of two teenage boys (periodic).  Gene tells the story of his friendship with Finny in their time at the Devon School.  One theme very present in this text is Codependency and its relation to a person’s identity.  The codependency in Gene and Finny’s relationship greatly affects their identities because it fuels their competitive nature, drives their actions, and without Finny, Gene seems lost.
Another common theme in this novel is competition and it is very apparent in Gene and Finny’s relationship.  One of the main issue leading to the climax of the book in chapters four and five is Gene’s fear that Finny is trying to sabotage him. His fear hangs like a cloud over his head (simile), changes the way he sees Finny, and displays how he sees himself. “Because it was what you had in your heart that counted. And I had detected that Finny’s was a den of lonely, selfish ambition. He was no better than I was, no matter who won all the contests” (Knowles, 26).  He connects both of their identities to their competitiveness.  This view changes how he acts.
In chapter four when Gene and Finny go to jump off a tree into the river, an activity they do frequently, Gene jounced the branch causing Finny to fall (compound-complex).  This is a very drastic action caused by Gene’s identity found in competition.  Finny, however, seems to see them more as friends than competitors saying, “ ‘I hope you’re having a pretty good time here. I know I kind of dragged you away at the point of a gun, but after all you can’t come to the shore with just anybody and you can’t come by yourself, and at this teen-age period in life the proper person is your best pal.’ He hesitated and then added, ‘which is what you are,’” (Knowles, 21). Recognizing their dependency, Finny, says he is willing to spend his teenage years, a time of self discovery, with Gene. Understanding their relationship, Finny, would like to spend time discovering their identities together, driving his actions.
In the chapters following Finny falling out of the tree and shattering his leg, Finny is absent because he is in the infirmary and then the hospital. Without Finny, Gene is trapped in a fog of confusion trying to make his way out (metaphor).  After Finny is taken to the infirmary, Gene has the following moment back at their dormitory: “But when I looked in the mirror it was no remote aristocrat I had become, no character out of daydreams. I was Phineas, Phineas to the life. I even had his humorous expression in my face, his sharp, optimistic awareness. I had no idea why this gave me such intense relief, but it seemed, standing there in Finny’s triumphant shirt, that I would never stumble through the confusions of my own character again” (Knowles, 29).  Is it the shirt or the reminder of his tie to Finny that comforts him (rhetorical question)?  
The codependency in Gene and Finny’s relationship greatly affects their identities because it fuels their competitive nature, drives their actions, and without Finny, Gene seems lost.  Their personalities are so different but they share the commonality of how they identify themselves (anaphora). Each other (rhetorical fragment).  Their identities are like conjoined twins sharing a heart, they need each other to survive (personification).  

Thursday, December 15, 2016

School Readings Analyzes and Review: The Great Gatsby and The Catcher in the Rye

In my AP English Class we had the pleasure of reading The Great Gatsby and The Catcher in the Rye.  I say that completely truthfully, I really loved both of them.  In this blog I am going to post the essays I was required to write by my English teacher and then a brief statement of my feelings.

Essay:


The Great Gatsby and its Relevancy in Reference to Today’s Social Issues
            The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald is a great American novel written in 1925.  The protagonist is named Nick Carraway and the story follows his experiences for a summer of living amongst the rich.  The novel covers topics such as identity, marriage/love versus lust, classicism, alcoholism, women’s rights, abuse, transportation, corruption, and wealth. One prominent theme that stuck out clearly to me is the correlation between one’s identity and their class. The character’s class and/or what class they long to be in define who they are and how they act, specifically amongst the rich.
            Two situations that really stuck out to me characterising how the rich act, are Gatsby’s party in chapter three and the scene where Gatsby gets out of a speeding ticket.  In both situations there is a sense of entitlement.  At the party people just show up uninvited not even knowing anything about the host. In reference to the people at the party the novel says, “Sometimes they came and went without having met Gatsby at all.” (Fitzgerald, 45) They aren’t there to see the host, they just feel entitled to a good time. They don't seem to care about anyone but themselves.  There is also Gatsby who gets caught speeding but simply for being wealthy and knowing the right people he gets out of it. All Gatsby has to do to get out of his ticket is show the policeman a picture, “Taking a white card from his wallet he waved it before the man’s eyes.” (Fitzgerald, 74).  A middle or lower class person can not just wave a white card and get out of a speeding ticket.  I think it speaks to how the world idolizes money. I found that scene specifically interesting since later in the book we find out Gatsby is breaking the law to make his money yet his money gets him out of trouble with the law. It just goes to show if you have money you have power and if you have power you are going to act more entitled.
            One character that really embodies money, greed, and how it affects who a person is is Daisy.  One thing that really defines Daisy is how she chose to marry Tom instead of waiting for Gatsby to return from the war. Tom was her easy answer because he was there and rich, two things Gatsby was not. She claims to love Gatsby, as proven through her interactions with him after chapter five and how she acted the night before her wedding, but in the end she betrays him. She lets him take the fall for Myrtle's death.  Then when he dies she does not even attend his funeral.  She is very entitled and greedy.  She never cared about Gatsby, for her, it was always about money and the sense of security that came with it.   
The problems among the upper class of The Great Gatsby are still problems today as proved in a study done by US psychologist Paul Piff, "As people grow wealthier, they are more likely to feel entitled, to become meaner and become meaner and more likely to exploit others, even to cheat." In the same study, he found,“The richest students were more likely to consider ‘stealing or benefiting from things to which they were not entitled’ than those from a middle-class or lower-class background.”  The rich feel entitled which, according to an article from Time Magazine, “could perpetuate a deepening lack of empathy that could fuel narcissistic tendencies.”  One thing that stuck out to me about this quote is the lack of empathy.  It reminded me of how after Gatsby dies everyone goes back to their lives uneffected. Only Nick, Mr. Gatz, Owl Eyes and Gatsby's servants attend the funeral.  The others all abandon him in his death.  People felt entitled to Gatsby for a good time.  They never cared about him.  It was all about his money and his parties.  
The Great Gatsby is an amazing novel pointing out the problems with the upperclass.  Fitzgerald points out the emotional withdraw, greed, and entitlement of the upperclass. And although the novel was written a little under a century ago, the social commentary still applies.  Fitzgerald recognizes the appeal of money but warns against throwing ourselves into the American Dream because of the corruption that comes with it.  I personally felt he wanted you to realize how money in the end really means nothing, that the most important thing is making connecctions with people. 
Sources:
  • Manne, Anne. "The Age of Entitlement: How Wealth Breeds Narcissism | Anne Manne." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 2014. Web. 06 Sept. 2016.
Szalavitz, Maia, and Maia Szalavitz. "Wealthy Selfies: How Being Rich Increases Narcissism | TIME.com." Time. Time, n.d. Web. 06 Sept. 2016.

Review:

This book has one one of the most beautiful thing I have ever read, "The most grotesque and fantastic conceits haunted him in his bed at night. A universe of ineffable gaudiness spun itself out in his brain while the clock ticked on the washstand and the moon soaked with wet light his tangled clothes upon the floor. Each night he added to the pattern of his fancies until drowsiness closed down upon some vivid scene with an oblivious embrace.  For a while there reveries provided an outlet for his imagination; they were a satisfactory hint of the unreality of reality, a promise that the rock of the world was founded securely on a fairy's wing." 
I just love this paragraph so much! I think its so beautiful.  I have it hanging on a bulletin board in my room. It just has such vivid imagery.  And I relate a little bit because I fall asleep to day dreams. 
I LOVE THIS BOOK SO MUCH! It is so beautifully written and all the messages in it are so true! It's so heart breaking in its reality! I highly recommend it though I assume if you've made it this far then you already have. 

Essay: 

Rhetorical Strategies in the Catcher in the Rye
            The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger, written in 1951, is often taught in high schools because of its commentary on adolescence, authenticity, and self identity. The book is told from the perspective of Holden Caulfield.  Holden tells the reader the story of a weekend bumming around New York City that contributed to him ending up in a mental hospital. Salinger employed many different rhetorical strategies to express the struggles of adolescence including, figurative language, motifs, and a unique writing technique.
            Salinger employed a lot of figurative language. He used symbolism in objects or places such as the red hunting hat, the carousel, and the Museum of Natural History.  He also employed things like irony and allusions.  One prominent example of both allusion and symbolism is the novel’s title, the Catcher in the Rye. Salinger draws this title from Robert Burns poem Comin Thro’ the Rye. He also uses it to get across one of the main points in his book. The poem says, “If a body meet a body comin thro’ the rye.” (Burns) but Holden mistakes the lyrics as if a body catch a body. When talking to his sister about what he wants to be he says, “‘I keep picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and all.  Thousands of little kids, and nobody’s around-nobody big I mean-except me.  And I’m standing on the edge of some crazy cliff.  What I have to do, I have to catch everybody if they start to go over the cliff-I mean if they’re running and they don’t look where they’re going I have to come out from somewhere and catch them. That’s all I’d do all day. I’d just be the catcher in the rye and all.” (Salinger, 191) In this Salinger uses symbolism.  By Holden saying he wants to be the “catcher in the rye” he is really saying he wants to protect the children from the adult world.  This is further supported when Holden is at his sister’s, Phoebe, elementary school and he sees the word f--- you written on the wall. Holden said, “It drove me damn near crazy. I thought how Phoebe and all the other little kids would see it, and how they’d wonder what the hell it meant, and then finally some dirty kid would tell them-all cockeyed, naturally-what it means, and how they’d all think about it and maybe worry about it for a couple of days.”  He doesn’t want the kids to worry about the adult world like he has to. He wants things to stay the same and not have to face the adult world.  Salinger is trying to show the feeling of impending doom and anxiety that can come along with adolescence, growing up, and entering the scary adult world.  
            Another way Salinger got his message across was using motifs.  The most notable being sexuality. Throughout the novel Holden often brings up his infatuation with women, how sexual his peers are, and his virginity. It is used to emphasize two things, Holden’s fear for change and the appeal yet fear of the unknown adult world.  Probably the most famous scene of this novel occurs in chapter 13 when Holden orders a prostitute at a hotel. While preparing for her to come up, Holden gives us this information, “I was starting to feel pretty sexy and all, but I was a little nervous anyway.  If you want to know the truth, I’m a virgin. I really am.” (Salinger, 103) Once the prostitute arrives Holden second guesses his decision and doesn’t end up having sex with the prostitute. He ends up saying “‘Don’t you feel like talking for a while?’ I asked her. It was a childish thing to say but I was feeling so damn peculiar. ‘Are you in a very big hurry?’” (Salinger, 106)  Holden is nervous about losing his virginity. He is very innocent and has this romanticized way of looking at the world.  One word to focus on is the last bit of dialogue is hurry. Salinger is commenting on the hurry for adolescents to grow up and face the world unprepared.
Salinger employed a specific writing technique to achieve his purpose.  The story is written as a flash back and as a stream of consciousness.  Holden writes what he feels is appropriate and he does so unapologetically. For example the novel opens with Holden saying, “If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you’ll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my parents were occupied and all before they had me, and all that David Copperfield kind of crap, but I don’t feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth.” (Salinger, 3) proving he is writing only what he views as important. It allows for Holden’s true thoughts the be exposed with no filter. It allows for Salinger to show Holden’s innocence and fear for the adult world.  Using this technique Salinger is able to show not only how the “phony” adult world treats Holden but what it does to him mentally.          
            Salinger employed many different rhetorical strategies to express the struggles of adolescence including, figurative language, motifs, and a unique writing technique in The Catcher in the Rye. The novel is a beautifully complex coming of age story about the pressures of growing up and the kind of world you have to face as an adult. It is about struggles teenagers can still relate to today.  There are no instructions or warnings for adolescents entering the adult world. It is full of phonies and corruptions.  Salinger recognized the struggles teenagers must face.  Yet even though in the end Holden ended up in a mental hospital, Salinger gives the reader a glimmer of hope in the second to last chapter when Holden says, “My hunting hat really gave me quite a lot of protection, in a way, but I got soaked anyways. I didn’t care, though. I felt so damn happy all of a sudden, the way old Phoebe kept going around and around. I was damn near bawling, I felt so damn happy, if you want to know the truth.” Salinger wanted the world to know that even though the adult world is dark and scary there is a chance of happiness. That there is a time and place for innocence and there is nothing wrong with wanting to be the catcher in the rye.  

Review:

I think this book is so underrated.  I swear 9 out of 10 people I've talked to didn't like this book and that is crazy to me! I really love the stream of consciousness, passive voice writing style. I think it breeds sympathy in the reader. And as a teenager I really related to the fear of adulthood and loosing your innocence.  I really love coming of age stories, A Separate Peace is my favorite! I think I like them because I had a traumatic experience that snapped me into the harsh reality of the world when I was twelve and these books explain my emotions I felt.  I didn't push anyone of a tree or go crazy as my traumatic experience, I think I'll write a blog posted about what happened at a later date. Anyways, while I think not all teenagers are crazy I think our fears and strong emotions are accurately voiced in The Catcher in the Rye and I really loved it. 

I hope you have a fantastic day,

Megan 

Saturday, December 10, 2016

A Satire Piece: The Anecdote to Rationality (Sorry I'm going Political and Hippie on you Again) Re posted because it looked strange last time

(So Punny) 

I'm sorry but we had to write a satire piece for English and I chose the ridiculous way politics are handed it (I'm not immune to this either but if you haven't noticed by now, I hate it): 

The Anecdote to Rationality

In recent times it has become very apparent to me that reaching an agreement when it comes to American politics is impossible.  It should be quite easy considering that one side is right and the other side is completely, totally, and utterly wrong but it turns out people can't agree on who is completely, totally, and utterly wrong, since argument are all or nothing. It happens in our government and in our everyday American citizen discussions.  However, I have come up with a very simple plan to solve this problem.  Rather than try and understand each other's viewpoints and come to a logical comprise (what a truly ridiculous idea), we should instead have a contest to see which party can hold a louder scream for the longest amount of time. 
Here's how it would work in terms of the government, in each branch of government each party would have a designated screamer.  To avoid possible corruption, such as a party choosing a professional screamer, the screamer should be chosen by an indifferent third party, preferably not an American citizen. Then when a disagreement arises in a branch of government between the two dominant parties, democrats and republicans, they would call on their screamers to settle it.  There would be a referee to determine the results of the contest.  The competition would occur in front of the whole branch of government to prevent one side cheating, for example bribing the referee.  Using a microphone and a scream analyzing machine, like those used in the popular movie, Monsters Inc., the two screamers would give the scream their best shots.  A coin toss would be used to decide who would take the first turn. After both screams had been recorded the referee would review the results and declare the winner.  Who ever wins the screaming competition won the argument and their desired and correct legislation could be passed or they could shoot down clearly awful legislation for fate is on their side so they must be right. 
Now personal arguments would be handled much more informally.  For example when disagreeing with a family member on Thanksgiving over a particular political view, the two parties would take their turns screaming and the other members of the family would decide who won.  However, if one party's view had already gone through a scream competition in the branches of the government they are allowed to claim that scream as their and win the argument.  Thus may seem unfair to some but remember once an argument has won it is always correct no matter the consequences. 
It is really quite a smart solution to such a complex problem.  I mean, respecting other people's opinions and reaching common ground, as I already mentioned, it just preposterous! Instead we should return to the simplistic ways of children. Children are smart enough and experienced enough to know that no argument is solved through logic.  It is only solved through competition.  And since there is an abundance of loud, frustrated, childlike yelling (or as some might call it, debate) in politics already, why not just reduce the future of our country to a simple screaming match?

I hope you have a fantastic day, 

Megan